View Full Version : Here Is My Vac Proof Contribution
ShortRound
14th January 2003, 22:39
SHORTROUND's OGC 1.01 *VAC PROOF*
Hey I think it is really great that MattDog got OGC 9 working again but that just wasn't enough for me and it didnt seem like anyone else was doing anything about.
So anyways, I shoved a bunch of stuff together and used OGC 9, VAC proofed by MattDog and I put this together. I decided to release it because no one else was releasing anything.
This is the first version and it probably has minor bugs everywhere but it is VERY powerfull in its features which it has many of.
As long as it remains VAC proof there still is a lot to be done but its freakishly the most effective hack anyone's used on VAC servers lately. Otherwise I would not have bothered releasing.
enjoy
Ps. I didnt look over it very much before i submitted so report to me any problems: thelunchbocks@hotmail.com
ThePuppetMaster
14th January 2003, 22:40
How is the aimbot. I don't care about any other little pointless features except aimbot ;).
ShortRound
14th January 2003, 22:43
aimbot on this thing is NUTS. Just check it out and you will knowo what i am talking about. There are probably close to 100 vecs and all the ones i have tried have been excellent. I probably average 30 kills before someone can kill me. Sometimes much higher
ThePuppetMaster
14th January 2003, 22:46
Sounds cool but i'll have to try it later tonight. Got my cdkey stolen hehe.
4star
14th January 2003, 22:58
Hmm...interesting.
So this is mattdogs OGC? But what did you change about it, other than vecs?
NightNinja
14th January 2003, 23:10
I think someone needs to incorparate something so that mattdog's OGC will work without u keep having to get ur key, put it in the key locker and start up OGC 9 within 10 seconds of that...
o({})o
14th January 2003, 23:20
lol, if you are going to call it your own, you have to re-code it.... adding a few vecs doesn't make it "your" cheat.... changing s few files in the configs is by no means changing any "source" files....
Good work though....
4star
14th January 2003, 23:46
Yeah, so technically its not *Your* vac proof contribution...
It's your Vac proof cheat altered by you :)
But anyways, gj :)
ShortRound
14th January 2003, 23:52
No I think i will still call it my own. I tweaked it. Why would I not rename it different from the original? Imagine if all tweaks were labeled as the original hahaha. If its an issue of not saying who did the coding then I implore you to read a bit more heheh. Even off of here its stressed in the docs enclosed should you download it.
and yes its cfg changes and additions but they equal more choice, more features, and powerfull ones.
If cfg changes lets you have speedhack up to 600X instead of max 6X, then thats fine by me.
let me clarify
SHORTROUND's OGC 1.01 IS A TWEAK OF VAC PROOF OGC. (proofed by mattdog).
It is intended for people who want to use OGC 9 with improved and added features. It is to give people options.
If anyone thinks that having at least one public tweak of VAC proof OGC 9 is a bad thing then please let me know so i can refrain from advancing.
o({})o
14th January 2003, 23:57
How about calling it: OGC v9.0 by MattDog (ShortRound Tweak)
lol, shouldn't take credit for something you didn't code....
I suppose it is up to you though....
4star
15th January 2003, 00:04
If you dont alter the SOURCE, it's not yours. And since the source is not available...ITS NOT YOURS! :chinese:
ShortRound
15th January 2003, 00:23
well i didn't know that there was a universal formatt. Im sorry would adding a 9 make it ok? You do know there are about 1000 other tweaks and people you should be notifying too. man XGC, Jedi, UGC, and a whole load of people are gonna be crapping their pants.
4star
15th January 2003, 03:17
They modified the source.
Hex
15th January 2003, 03:31
what i would like to point out is the fact that he stole some of the stuff from projectX my original ogc tweak made infact by ogc team and tweaked by me and my one friend so i would like some credit for the scripts and hud colors that we made for out hack instead of renaming it to <B^M> cause it was <P^X> once again thanx i dont really care since it was ogc team who created the hack that i tweaked but still i think it would be nice thanx and bye also new
ProjectX Revolutionized : soon
4star
15th January 2003, 03:34
Heh, people dont like it when stuff gets ripped ;)
Hex
15th January 2003, 03:35
once again 4star is right go 4star
so please give credit thanx :alien:
4star
15th January 2003, 03:38
You heard him ShortRound, edit it :)
Hex
15th January 2003, 03:40
yes edit it in the credits and also in the command menu turn everything back to normal with the names too please
ShortRound
15th January 2003, 05:39
i didnt rename that. that's how i got it from black majik and the author of black majik is credited. and im not going to change everything and credit every single persons claims. i really dont care that much but if it means so much to you then you can edit it yourself, send it back to me and i will include it if i update.
and no 4star, XGC, JEDI, UCC, BM, to name 4 out of thousands, did NOT alter source. I really don't know why you said that.
by the way spider man and 4star agreeing? cos you realize that spider man wants credit for his "claimed" tweaking yet 4star says you shouldnt put your name on tweaks.
honestly people, all this over the fact that there isnt a 9 beside OGC on the zip file. rename it who cares already. There insnt even one file inside the zip that is named after me. and if you actually READ any of the documents and weren't satisfied with mattdog being credited about 50 million times then type his name some more to make yourself happy.
ps. i credited things according to information provided it. most of it was unsigned and i just dont care enough to scour the internet until there is someone to claim every one of about 100 things that could be claimed. but according to 4star none of you "tweakers" should have your name anywhere so chill.
done.
dont care anymore. you dont like the name of the zip. dont use it for all i care.
4star
15th January 2003, 21:44
and no 4star, XGC, JEDI, UCC, BM, to name 4 out of thousands, did NOT alter source. I really don't know why you said that.
You're kidding, right? You think they added all of those features without touching the source? I hope you weren't serious.
but according to 4star none of you "tweakers" should have your name anywhere so chill.
I believe I've already made my point on this very clear and therefore will not state it again.
Sno
15th January 2003, 22:01
STOP COMPLAINING AND FLAMING... just say thanks or say nothing
but my opinion is that if you tweak the source you have the right to change the name completly such as joolz and ugc so on and so on but if you just change the cfg making different vecs and stuff it would be considered a TWEAK not your own cheat so I suggest you call it
ShortRound OGC 9 Tweak
oh and about XGC, JEDI, UCC, BM I know they changed the source why because the exe sizes were different
4star
15th January 2003, 22:07
TY Sno, and sorry bout the flaming.
:)
ShortRound
15th January 2003, 22:24
the exe sizes were different because they werent all the same versions of ogc.
for exmaple a tweak of joolz is not the same size as a tweak of ogc 9 or ogc 10.
and yes all those features can be added without changing source because those features have been taken directly from such tweaks as xgc and bm and they work fine.
i will add "tweak" on the name of the zipfile next time i didnt realize people wouldnt read the docs. sorry for the inconvenience.
Hex
15th January 2003, 22:57
still if u want those hud colors and stuff then u should get it from projectX with its original names and u can get it from the ftp on here its the latest one which is pr0j3ctXfv3.zip and new version will be out soon by the way
NightNinja
15th January 2003, 23:29
Shortround he meant the sizes were different FOR THE SAME HACK, as in different file sizes for the same OGC 9, one has a tweaked source...etc. Now either stop the flame fest or this thread will be closed, This is ur final warning.
ShortRound
16th January 2003, 00:55
the ones listed werent the same. eg. xgc=ogc 10 and bm=ogc 9
and thanks spider i will check out projectx before i update
-shorty-
ps. do you mean flaming like a flamer? i dont know with this place anymore the way they use that word so much. but i aint no torch
[IEG]G0d
16th January 2003, 01:12
well the hack isnt that bad although it is just copy and paste but thanks for credit at least
Dr_Death
16th January 2003, 01:19
My god people just love to flame one another ..
ShortRound
16th January 2003, 01:51
ya i your vecs own, G0d.
on another note, I think VAC might have just implemented a way to detect this hook
so no more VAC proof.
but im not positive, i keep getting kicked and having the entire program close on me with no messages.
might be a script or might be MattDogs hook method as a whole. anyways.
watch out
[MPC]UnKnOwN
16th January 2003, 06:55
shortround I am 100% positive that all of the tweaks you listed before were "source-modified tweaks"...i just have something to ask: How would you like it if you slaved away learning how to bypass an anti-cheat and re-code a hack only to have it be taken by some person, they add some vecs, and rename it and give no real credit to you for spending all of those hours on it. If you say you wouldn't mind you are fooling yourself.
Dark_Omen
16th January 2003, 07:07
I couldn't understand why would you complain over a hack that has parts ripped off from other places. I mean whats the big deal about it. Hacks always will contain something that looks similar to other hacks but if you are so insecure and would do anything to keep your work uncopied, think about putting a copyright. Otherwise, stop complaining.
Besides, at least shortround has made a decent contribution or else noone would really be able to benefit that much. Why not let us get along and stop whinging over copied work?
o({})o
16th January 2003, 13:35
Ok, let let it die here people :).
It is wrong to steal other people's work, but as long as he gives some credit to the original author, then it is ok.... I guess....
Thats better than www.************s.com does....
Oxcide
16th January 2003, 14:41
FEEL THE LOVE!
no but seriously, if you use someones base hack add vecs thats tweaking so credit should be given, if you got the source edited it put some of your own features in then you can call it what you want.
juts like the HLHa i have "tweaked" (<--For NS) i just rescripted the cfg's. found out all the Bone vecs myself, so its is Tweaked i kept all the original Faqs and doc's so credit is given where needed :P ps if you get a NS section going i'll upload it.
UTperson782
16th January 2003, 18:18
does it have mouse2 aiming?
ShortRound
16th January 2003, 21:54
Originally posted by [MPC]UnKnOwN
shortround I am 100% positive that all of the tweaks you listed before were "source-modified tweaks"...i just have something to ask: How would you like it if you slaved away learning how to bypass an anti-cheat and re-code a hack only to have it be taken by some person, they add some vecs, and rename it and give no real credit to you for spending all of those hours on it. If you say you wouldn't mind you are fooling yourself.
I actually didnt rename anything. When i generated the zip file i named it. None of the files inside are renamed.
And there is credit in every document. try looking.
any other questions? e-mail me: thelunchbocks@hotmail.com
and yes UTperson Mouse2 aiming is supported as in probably all versions of OGC you will find
and please if anyone else wants to comment on the hack then please download it first then e-mail me. because if you are rude on here then they might close the thread.
[MPC]UnKnOwN
17th January 2003, 07:29
i wasnt trying to be rude i was just trying to help you understand the situation
ShortRound
18th January 2003, 00:00
how much is a lot of downloads off this forum?
o({})o
18th January 2003, 02:31
I recall some files being downloaded thousands of times....
However, if people continue to spam this thread then no one is going to be downloading it ;).
NightNinja
18th January 2003, 02:55
I agree, hebe said stop the spam, so end this conversation that has gone completely off-topic, if no one has anything on topic to say, don't say it. If another post in this topic goes towards the direction it was just in, this thread will be closed.
ShortRound
18th January 2003, 20:07
OK I confirmed that this hack is NOT yet detected by VAC. That was my mistake, it was something else getting detected. all the scripts included that work are VAC proof still as well as matt dogs hook as a whole. disregard my previous comment about it getting picked up. false alarm :confused:
-shorty-
UTperson782
21st January 2003, 02:41
MOUSE 2 AIMING !???
CoLd_MeLaNcHoLy
22nd January 2003, 01:55
I dont see why everyone is getting so worked up over a modified hack, it's his first technical "release" and everyone starts somewhere... give mattdog credit (by which you did) and incoporate a massive library of aimvecs (which is cool, just to see what works for everyone, everybody has different systems) in addition, it works so dont complain :p so gj and keep improving ShortRound
ShortRound
22nd January 2003, 08:13
thanks man.
and YES UTperson there is mouse 2 aiming didnt we already say that. By the way there is a new version out check for it on this forum there is an attachment and short description.
-shorty-
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.2 Copyright © 2010 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.