PDA

View Full Version : [MSEA] Rev588


samkhoo
8th April 2006, 18:42
I got this somewhere it successful emulation but until login screen it quit and pop up GG detect hack error message. can any1 help? thks

nicholasrock
9th April 2006, 12:36
lol i think its private. if it is not , mods pls faster approve

leafs
9th April 2006, 16:09
this bcoz .. THIS ISSNT the private msea rev 566 .. its superbly private for this rev .. acttualy its from gms and edited to msea scoures ..coz msea dont haf rev566 b4 .. if sucessfully edit , can juz use ce without bypass .. and hacking like oldday without nprotect =)

baphomet
9th April 2006, 16:34
this bcoz .. THIS ISSNT the private msea rev 566 .. its superbly private for this rev .. acttualy its from gms and edited to msea scoures ..coz msea dont haf rev566 b4 .. if sucessfully edit , can juz use ce without bypass .. and hacking like oldday without nprotect =)

dude,even emulate to rev 566 also need bypass to use hacking tools,except u got an edited CE then i think it is no point to emulate

leafs
9th April 2006, 16:57
dude,even emulate to rev 566 also need bypass to use hacking tools,except u got an edited CE then i think it is no point to emulate

dude .. if this rev really the editted one .. we DOSENT need to bypass anything coz when thats the old rev , this mean its b4 REV641 the rev that nprotect cames out . with OLDER rev we can juz use any hacks we want i belive =)

Dioragry
9th April 2006, 17:36
nope..rev588 cannot use CE yet..rev566 onli can use...

noglorp
9th April 2006, 17:53
This isn't "MSea rev 588", this is a blend of the current MSea rev and the oMS rev 588.

Therefore, it is functionally similar/identical to oMS rev 588.

~nog_lorp

Dioragry
9th April 2006, 18:02
i tink this is the edited rev to work for Msea

theflash
9th April 2006, 18:37
mpc doesnt support private hackers, the idea of it no longer exists here, if its released then let it be, stop saying stupid things pls...

btw, wouldnt 566 work better then 588? >_>

sasuke604
9th April 2006, 18:42
maybe he doesnt want you guys to have it xD

Dioragry
9th April 2006, 19:19
rev566 is better than rev588
bcoz the lower the rev files are...the less thing it detects..

nighthawkkkk
9th April 2006, 19:57
use prevx home
that should be fine,i was using 566 in oms with prex home/prevx1 fine
and actool works too
btw,can u tell me how did u edit it?
(about what file and what programme)

sasuke604
9th April 2006, 20:16
Dont make me post 566 >=(
Actools doesnt work anymore whatu talking about..

nighthawkkkk
9th April 2006, 20:26
i had got it work what

sasuke604
9th April 2006, 22:28
show me how plox XD

Dioragry
10th April 2006, 04:52
hmm...not yet approved?

Diddle
10th April 2006, 08:13
Ugh... sorry for the rediculous delay...


File: msea_rev_588.rar
Status: POSSIBLY INFECTED/MALWARE (Note: this file has been scanned before. Therefore, this file's scan results will not be stored in the database) (Note: this file was only flagged as malware by heuristic detection(s). This might be a false positive. Therefore, results of this scan will not be stored in the database)
MD5: 5aa7858ff34d62fc50210f9c216711ae
Packers Detected: UPX

Scan Results
AntiVir: Found Heuristic/Backdoor.Dropper (probable variant)
ArcaVir: Found Nothing
Avast: Found Nothing
AVG Antivirus: Found Nothing
BitDefender: Found Nothing
ClamAV: Found Nothing
Dr. Web: Found Nothing
F-Prot Antivirus: Found Nothing
Fortinet: Found Nothing
Kaspersky Anti-Virus: Found Nothing
NOD32: Found Nothing
Norman Virus Control: Found Nothing
UNA: Found Nothing
VirusBuster: Found Nothing
VBA32: Found Nothing

Source: Jotti's Virusscan (http://virusscan.jotti.org/)Most likely a fake detection (happens all the time with AntiVir) -> File approved.

As always: Use at your own risk!

Dioragry
11th April 2006, 06:09
can explain to me wat does Heuristic/Backdoor.Dropper do?