PDA

View Full Version : Working Hacks

ihateacid
13th December 2006, 00:09
<i'll probably be able to update this 2-month old stickie during christmas break, but i'd like some opinions, post below>
timon
13th December 2006, 00:23
Sure go ahead. I may be able to make something to fill in missing slots too.
belink
13th December 2006, 05:53
Add catalyst aimbot source code.
maxes21
24th December 2006, 23:37
http://www.mpcforum.com/showthread.php?t=172563 working anti recoil
AU.Leech
28th December 2006, 05:31
I have just had my friends steam account banned using one of the following hacks: HLH lite: HLH pub 11.04 +. Just warning.
oksmokeit
28th December 2006, 06:14
<i'll probably be able to update this 2-month old stickie during christmas break, but i'd like some opinions, post below>

i was just about to post a request to update this for the new year :knockedout:

would be great if someone could do that

PS w00t first post

:bunny: :bunny: :bunny: :bunny: :bunny: :shocked: :bunny: :bunny: :bunny: :bunny:
JAvEX
28th December 2006, 23:30
First post, eh. Well please don't make it your last. Go and read the sticky entitled "[Must Read] The Rules - Not reading => Ban!", then read the official MPC rules. You're violating the the smilie rule right now....
juanosky
21st January 2007, 22:29
The no flash / no smoke doesn't work.... Servers enforce it...
Holz
21st January 2007, 22:35
Well, thanks for the pointer, juanosky.


But as you can see the last time this has been update was October 01, 2006, so quite a bunch of hacks in here don't work anymore now.
Speeders
31st January 2007, 15:29
they should really update this or someone should make a new one.
Predieanalien
11th February 2007, 08:19
they should really update this or someone should make a new one.Yeah, can someone please update this? I'm dieing to get a Wall hack.
Holz
11th February 2007, 14:34
This will be updated once, just don't beg for it.


You can easily find many different wallhacks by checking out all those releases and searching, even in this outdated working hacks sticky you can find a bunch of still working wallhacks.
JAvEX
11th February 2007, 18:24
@Predieanalien. It's understandable that you'd like us to update this, but just like Holz said... and then ask yourself "how do you we update this?" Let me answer that question: we go through all the release threads, and we use the search tool. I would update this myself, but at the moment I really don't have enough spare time. Unlike you, you're only looking for a wallhack... We have to search and find each and every hack that's been released, and then we have to test out each hack to ensure that it's fully functional, we also have to read through the release thread (multiple pages), so we find out various things about the particular hack, for example: whether or not the hack is VAC2 detected. Not only that, we have to check all current hacks in the list to ensure that they are still working. Now you have one of two choices, sit tight and wait, eventually one of us moderators will make time to fully update this, or you can take the initiative, and go abouts finding that wallhack yourself.
charlie
11th February 2007, 20:18
This thread is mega old (last edited sept 06)

Seriously needs updating, otherwise it's not very useful.
JAvEX
11th February 2007, 22:08
@charlie. Last edited by ihateacid : 13th October 2006 at 16:39. You're just a month off... So this list is really about 4 months old... Which is a considerable amount of time not to be updated, yes I understand that. But...

Firstly, most of the hacks in this thread ARE still working. Secondly, if you'd like to volunteer to update the list, by all means, I'm not stopping you. Get it all uptodate, then PM it to me, and I'll update it giving you the credit. If you're not willing to do it, don't complain about it. Yes this will be updated, but I really don't have the time right now. Maybe when RandomJesture gets back, he'll do it (or maybe Holz or acid will). If no one updates this in a month or two, I should have enough time to do it myself.
Holz
11th February 2007, 22:36
If it won't be done already (by charlie, randomjester, JAvEX, ihateacid, or whomsoever) I will do it as soon as I'm at my own computer again, which might be in a few weeks or months.
randomjester
24th February 2007, 09:09
Working Hacks Sticky Thread
http://www.mpcforum.com/showthread.php?t=153103

I believe the thread is now not up-to-date. I would like to get some help though. Can someone please double check the thread to see if (1) all the information is correct (2) the vac status is correct (3) check for disabled/patched hacks (4) check for broken links (5) check for missing hacks.

Please post any and all info here.
Thanks.
UltraFreak
24th February 2007, 14:39
Working Hacks Sticky Thread
http://www.mpcforum.com/showthread.php?t=153103

I believe the thread is now not up-to-date. I would like to get some help though. Can someone please double check the thread to see if (1) all the information is correct (2) the vac status is correct (3) check for disabled/patched hacks (4) check for broken links (5) check for missing hacks.

Please post any and all info here.
Thanks.

SourceSux v2 seems to be missing.
It's missing a few source codes (atleast I saw one requested above).

----------

Something else I'd plead for is new "status"'s. Right now we have:
"VAC Proof" "Detected" "Unknown"

Things like HL2H however aren't really "VAC proof", since its technically possible for it to be detected by VAC. In my opinion the VAC Proof label should only be used when it's not possible to be detected by VAC (Mathacks or alike).

I plead for adding an "Undetected" label.
MatrX2006
24th February 2007, 16:58
Things like HL2H however aren't really "VAC proof", since its technically possible for it to be detected by VAC. In my opinion the VAC Proof label should only be used when it's not possible to be detected by VAC (Mathacks or alike).

I plead for adding an "Undetected" label.

I so couldn't agree more with you dude, so I'm in on that one! :cow:
JAvEX
24th February 2007, 20:17
@UltraFreak. I agree as well. But since we aren't sure whether it really is detected, I've changed the status to "Unknown". I think we can agree on that.
MatrX2006
24th February 2007, 23:32
@UltraFreak. I agree as well. But since we aren't sure whether it really is detected, I've changed the status to "Unknown". I think we can agree on that.

And once again I couldn't agree more with you too JAvEX on this one too. That would do it..., for now that is.
randomjester
25th February 2007, 04:19
@UltraFreak
Thank you, I've added Source_Sux 2.0.

The thread has once again been updated. It's been reorganized, disabled/patched hacks removed, old hacks updated, vac status updated, and finally new hacks added.
It should now be up to date. If anyone wants to double check my work, please post here any additions, questions, and/or comments you have.