View Full Version : kiki engine under vista?
nepheleem
21st August 2007, 13:56
anybody using kiki engine under windows vista? just asking, cause, i crashing like hell.. :dead:
S3NSA
21st August 2007, 20:32
vista =/= hacking. As far as I knew you could hack on vista as it lacks systemcallretrieve.
nekkron
22nd August 2007, 08:59
yeah, i'm running xpsp3 and vistasp1. both work well with the uce's i am using, one of them is kiki engine 1.4.1, but dw you're not alone alot of people will have trouble using vista, it's the os.
S3NSA
22nd August 2007, 11:51
how did you manage to get a standard UCE to work with vista? Unless Kiki modded it 0.o but even then it would have to rely on dll's etc.
nekkron
22nd August 2007, 16:30
well not standard, but just use it like you would on xp
scruie
22nd August 2007, 21:02
yeah, i'm running xpsp3 and vistasp1. both work well with the uce's i am using, one of them is kiki engine 1.4.1, but dw you're not alone alot of people will have trouble using vista, it's the os.
WTF! There is no such thing as XP SP3 or Vista SP1; M$ haven't released those service packs yet - heck Vista SP1 isn't even in beta yet.
infamousleo
22nd August 2007, 22:33
WTF! There is no such thing as XP SP3 or Vista SP1; M$ haven't released those service packs yet - heck Vista SP1 isn't even in beta yet.
Hes from the future =D
nepheleem
23rd August 2007, 17:09
WTF! There is no such thing as XP SP3 or Vista SP1; M$ haven't released those service packs yet - heck Vista SP1 isn't even in beta yet.
you're right, i'm was just gonna ask where he downloaded it, and guess i was right.. hehe.. :D anyway, i think its a callretriever, i guess ce detects my os as an old os, it tells me "upgrade mr flinstone".. X_X anyway, i'm gonna wait for a while.. or play legit.. :D
nekkron
24th August 2007, 04:27
WTF! There is no such thing as XP SP3 or Vista SP1; M$ haven't released those service packs yet - heck Vista SP1 isn't even in beta yet.
actually you are completely right in saying that they have not been released commercially, and windows xpsp3 is not going to be. but vista sp1 has been available from msdn since open beta 2. but that does not mean that corporate editions do not exist and haven't been available for download since last year. (lol, it's called warez for a reason; not that i will affiliate myself or support warez and warez groups, nor will i say it's the right way)
yugiman
24th August 2007, 05:28
Im looking for the KiKi engine and I cant seem to find it. Can someone post it please?
DiDDyJ
24th August 2007, 06:59
Im looking for the KiKi engine and I cant seem to find it. Can someone post it please?
www.google.com is your best friend.
It doesn't have to be KiKi, you can use other available engine like DA Engine.
scruie
25th August 2007, 02:22
actually you are completely right in saying that they have not been released commercially, and windows xpsp3 is not going to be. but vista sp1 has been available from msdn since open beta 2. but that does not mean that corporate editions do not exist and haven't been available for download since last year. (lol, it's called warez for a reason; not that i will affiliate myself or support warez and warez groups, nor will i say it's the right way)
Lol, never read so much rubbish in ages. Last year! WTF! Vista was only released last November - why the hell would M$ release a Service Pack last year?
There will be a Service Pack 3 for XP, though M$ have knocked the date back until after Vista and Windows Server 2008 (aka Windows Home Server) service packs.
There's no Vista SP beta out - many inaccurate statements have been made about it. Neither M$ Gold nor MSDN members have it - member of both for several years. In fact, even M$ made a mistake when they 'claimed' to have released it on Connect as it was for Windows Server 2008.
Try again.
nekkron
25th August 2007, 18:06
Lol, never read so much rubbish in ages. Last year! WTF! Vista was only released last November - why the hell would M$ release a Service Pack last year?
There will be a Service Pack 3 for XP, though M$ have knocked the date back until after Vista and Windows Server 2008 (aka Windows Home Server) service packs.
There's no Vista SP beta out - many inaccurate statements have been made about it. Neither M$ Gold nor MSDN members have it - member of both for several years. In fact, even M$ made a mistake when they 'claimed' to have released it on Connect as it was for Windows Server 2008.
Try again.
i'm not going to get into an argument, i was in a bad mood when i wrote it so it may be inaccurate. if you didn't notice, i said from back to the open beta 2 stage, which was not in november; i too have been a regular subscriber to msdn for several years now (being 4y+) and i myself participate in many participation programs, inc. msdn/windows live/ms connect and have limited access to windows beta due to some of those programs. i am sorry though i did say it WAS available from msdn, i should have said it's been available since they brought out open beta 2 ON msdn, and i said nothing about the service pack being a beta, that must be an official one as i did say it was warez. but the cooperate edition of sp3 still remains correct. truthfully though in layman's terms the sp3/sp1 are just the the sp2/orig. editions of the os' with the very latest updates pre-modified into the installations with custom patches also pre-modified to spruce up the os', as if you were to look them up thats what they will say also. it DOES NOT say sp3/sp1 in the os' themselves but that is what they are called, if you are familiar with any sites that might host links to warez, that is exactly what you search for, you do not search for sp2/orig. you search for sp3/sp1, you will find them, and they are real. sorry if i confused you with my previous statement if i referred to them being 'officially released' as they are not.
scruie
25th August 2007, 21:27
lol, you backtrack and spin talk more than a politician.
Again, in simple terms there is no Vista Service pack as yet, nor has there ever been one in any form of release.
but the cooperate edition of sp3 still remains correct.
If you're referring to XP then there is no release of any XP SP3 editions from M$. Those listed at warez sites are just self-made copies of XP like the Gamers Lite or TinyXP editions.
It's very easy to add updates to a copy of XP and publish it as anything you want; visit http://www.nliteos.com/ for information on how to make such a CD. I do them all the time for customers.
Again, any so-called service pack for Vista is not from M$. It's just some collection of updates made into an excuteable and incorrectly named a service pack. No need to visit a warez site for such a file. I even use to make them myself with a simple batch to install all the updates downloaded from M$. You could even get one from www.autopatcher.com for all NT based OSes.
Thanks, for the entertainment. :)
nekkron
26th August 2007, 04:38
um ok? all you done was re-word what i already posted. and once again i never said anything about ms releasing nothing yet you still referred to me saying it.
back to the topic, got any pics or shots of what the errors say or does it just fatally crash without any?
scruie
26th August 2007, 07:52
um ok? all you done was re-word what i already posted. and once again i never said anything about ms releasing nothing yet you still referred to me saying it.
back to the topic, got any pics or shots of what the errors say or does it just fatally crash without any?
Reminder;
actually you are completely right in saying that they have not been released commercially, and windows xpsp3 is not going to be. but vista sp1 has been available from msdn since open beta 2. but that does not mean that corporate editions do not exist and haven't been available for download since last year. (lol, it's called warez for a reason; not that i will affiliate myself or support warez and warez groups, nor will i say it's the right way)
nekkron
26th August 2007, 12:20
lol get over it. when i replied my first time i said i made a mistake when i wrote it, but i cleared it up, if you are going to reply 'myself quoting myself' at least use the one that i corrected, and not the one prior to correcting it.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.