View Full Version : sv_pure bypass
gemini
15th September 2007, 02:41
bypass sv_pure
start cs:s (don't join a server)
switch back to windows
start bypass.exe
more infos & credits @ bypass.txt
JAvEX
15th September 2007, 03:17
Nice job gemini. Approved.
Voodoochild91
15th September 2007, 04:37
sounds sweet
^m!X
15th September 2007, 05:11
This bypass have any chance of getting VAC detected or does it work undetectable like materials?
belink
15th September 2007, 05:20
Has a change of VAC Bannage.
Nice to see you back, gemini. What happened? :P
^m!X
15th September 2007, 05:32
Anyone want to explain to me how this works?
Maagi
15th September 2007, 08:49
Enyone know this really works?
emwu1988
15th September 2007, 10:05
yay!!! thanks :)
as56d1as23
15th September 2007, 10:29
dont work for me...game crash
sv_pure_bypass.rar
Antivirus Verze Poslední aktualizace Výsledek
AntiVir 7.6.0.10 2007.09.14 HEUR/Crypted
CAT-QuickHeal 9.00 2007.09.14 (Suspicious) - DNAScan
eSafe 7.0.15.0 2007.09.13 suspicious Trojan/Worm
Panda 9.0.0.4 2007.09.14 Suspicious file
Sophos 4.21.0 2007.09.14 Mal/Packer
Sunbelt 2.2.907.0 2007.09.13 VIPRE.Suspicious
TheHacker 6.2.5.060 2007.09.14 W32/Behav-Heuristic-066
VirusBuster 4.3.26:9 2007.09.14 Packed/MEW
Webwasher-Gateway 6.0.1 2007.09.14 Win32.UPXpacked.gen!94 (suspicious)
File size: 29657 bytes
MD5: f16af3b35e7ffc4275c8aec859e69eac
SHA1: 85e473580d6556982649356d165343b55390d9ce
packers: UPX
packers: UPX, MEW
packers: UPX, MEW
Sunbelt info: VIPRE.Suspicious is a generic detection for potential threats that are deemed suspicious through heuristics.
USE ON YOUR OWN RISK!!
JAvEX
15th September 2007, 11:29
I scanned it with Jotti before approving, it came out only with
AntiVir - Found HEUR/Crypted
Sophos Antivirus - Found Mal/Packer
Your results from Virus Total show a bit more (I just scanned and recieved the same results there). I hope they're false positives. Even though I have a hard time believing that gemini would release a trojan on MPC... I have unapproved the attachment for the safety of our members. I'm really tired, and about to go to bed, so you'll all have to wait until I wake up or another mod looks into it.
Holz
15th September 2007, 13:44
Eh, file approved again, danke gemini. :p
And it does work well.
gemini
15th September 2007, 15:45
This bypass have any chance of getting VAC detected or does it work undetectable like materials?
well I added some stuff to avoid detection but its still dectecable like every other hook.
Nice to see you back, gemini. What happened? :P
played to much wow :D
AntiVir 7.6.0.10 2007.09.14 HEUR/Crypted
CAT-QuickHeal 9.00 2007.09.14 (Suspicious) - DNAScan
eSafe 7.0.15.0 2007.09.13 suspicious Trojan/Worm
Panda 9.0.0.4 2007.09.14 Suspicious file
Sophos 4.21.0 2007.09.14 Mal/Packer
Sunbelt 2.2.907.0 2007.09.13 VIPRE.Suspicious
TheHacker 6.2.5.060 2007.09.14 W32/Behav-Heuristic-066
VirusBuster 4.3.26:9 2007.09.14 Packed/MEW
false positives from the loader , could be changed with a loader of your choice.
Maagi
15th September 2007, 15:48
So i this vac proof for a week?
therealD4RkSouL
15th September 2007, 18:55
nice to see you back in here, gemini:P
Holz
16th September 2007, 04:47
Uploaded to MPCDownloads (http://www.mpcdownloads.com/):
[MPC Cheat Database (www.mpcdownloads.com)] -> [Counter-Strike: Source (http://www.mpcdownloads.com/forums/downloads/47-CS-Source-cheats-hacks/)] -> [sv_pure bypass 1.1 (http://www.mpcdownloads.com/forums/downloads/CS-Source/sv_pure-bypass-1.1/6961.html)]
cantcatchthis
16th September 2007, 09:29
awesome upload! definitely works, just tested it out myself. i'm just concerned about the VAC2 status of this thing, but then again, if you don't wanna get caught, don't use it right?
is there any info on the VAC status of this thing?
cantcatchthis
21st September 2007, 05:31
has any1 else tried this or is it just me? i'd like to hear some input from others...see what they think
Holz
21st September 2007, 09:16
Is what just you?
Input on what exactly?
cantcatchthis
22nd September 2007, 06:56
i was just wondering if anyone else has tried this or not? usually in the other threads people write down little tidbits like how well it functions, if there should be some improvements and stuff like that.
Holz
22nd September 2007, 13:30
Improvements?
Simpe pure mode bypass which is working well, no idea what you would improve there.
CampStaff
22nd September 2007, 14:53
I suggest the improvement be that it needs more pink. Cheats need more pink nowadays. this is no exception.
=D
cantcatchthis
23rd September 2007, 02:37
i'm not sure how this exactly works, but any modification done to hl2.exe gets you vac-banned, and i think this programs hooks into it right?
so a modification might be a sv_bypass method that absolutely will not get you banned. not saying that this program will get you banned 100%, it's just that you never know.
- FaNaTiC -
24th September 2007, 00:23
I wonder why you need a .DLL file for sv_pure bypass anyways :/
UltraFreak
24th September 2007, 01:25
I wonder why you need a .DLL file for sv_pure bypass anyways :/
It's moreso a case of not re-inventing the wheel. Write a .dll and slap on a general purpose injector. Simply saves time.
gemini
24th September 2007, 01:45
I wonder why you need a .DLL file for sv_pure bypass anyways :/
it could be done with a simple trainer/patcher but I dont see any reason why it would be better
Dolein
24th September 2007, 20:52
nice work gemini. i was a big fan of your sv_consistency bypasses a few years ago.
thanks for this.
- FaNaTiC -
25th September 2007, 14:19
I think a trainer/patcher(which closes itself after successful patch) is less detectable because you can close the program. and a DLL is injected to the process and you can see the DLL in the "dll list" of the Process, untill you inject it another way (which would be awesome to do, and to use) so it's not really "shown" (Like Hl2hook did).
But hey, good job anyways, even with DLL :P (And I hope this shows CampStaff that an sv_pure bypass can be done - I didn't want to release my private stuff because it would ruin my business :S)
CampStaff
26th September 2007, 03:42
I think a trainer/patcher(which closes itself after successful patch) is less detectable because you can close the program.Wrong, VAC scans regardless if your cheat is closed or not. [..] and a DLL is injected to the process and you can see the DLL in the "dll list" of the Process Wrong again, you can hide the injection from process list [..] untill you inject it another way (which would be awesome to do, and to use) Its already being done. In fact several members of this community have a cheat that does such so it's not really "shown" (Like Hl2hook did).
But hey, good job anyways, even with DLL :P Damn right good job, hell .. Great job. [..] (And I hope this shows CampStaff that an sv_pure bypass can be done
I never said it could not be done. I asked a question. I asked, "Can you bypass sv_pure servers w/ Mem cheat." Or something or other.. I'll look it up after I get back from work.
[..]- I didn't want to release my private stuff because it would ruin my business :S)Business is only as good as the cheat itself. Take for instance Royal Hack. Business seems to be good because of it being a good product delivered to the community, where as a group say like Sour Industries.. well lets not even go there.
gemini
26th September 2007, 15:57
I think a trainer/patcher(which closes itself after successful patch) is less detectable because you can close the program. and a DLL is injected to the process and you can see the DLL in the "dll list" of the Process, untill you inject it another way (which would be awesome to do, and to use) so it's not really "shown" (Like Hl2hook did).
peb hiding und simple pseudo-polymorphism could help
m-tek
26th September 2007, 16:42
I never said it could not be done. I asked a question. I asked, "Can you bypass sv_pure servers w/ Mem cheat." Or something or other..
Yes .... we've done it!!!!
CampStaff
26th September 2007, 16:54
Yes .... we've done it!!!!
And I never said you did not do it. I asked a question. Find where I did, if not, next please. (http://www.mpcforum.com/search.php?searchid=2079084)
m-tek
26th September 2007, 17:00
And I never said you did not do it. Next please.
You asked a question
I never said it could not be done. I asked a question. I asked, "Can you bypass sv_pure servers w/ Mem cheat." Or something or other.. I'll look it up after I get back from work.
So why the attitude????NEXT
belink
26th September 2007, 18:40
You asked a question He did ask a question, but it didnt need answering.
cantcatchthis
27th September 2007, 04:56
here's a question: anyone been banned for this yet??
Bauchpower
29th September 2007, 21:18
How can i hide the bypass.exe? (that you couldnīt see it in the process list?) thx
gemini
29th September 2007, 22:44
How can i hide the bypass.exe? (that you couldnīt see it in the process list?) thx
It closes automatically after injection
Bauchpower
30th September 2007, 14:57
can i do it so, that it "never" shows up in the Process list?
cantcatchthis
3rd October 2007, 05:21
wow, does this thing have an account stealer!? i end up clicking this thing once, i can log into steam, and i test it out. and now, i can't login... the password got changed or something!
thanx gemini!
Holz
3rd October 2007, 05:45
It does not.
And these false accusions without any slight proof are annoying as well.
rand0m
3rd October 2007, 11:26
Nice work.
Sniperblitzd
13th December 2007, 20:45
Is this detected? Because on the mpcdownloads it says it's not..
Holz
13th December 2007, 21:53
At least no one has complained about getting banned for using this.
s26d1a2s31da23s
15th December 2007, 18:08
better then holzed?
Holz
15th December 2007, 18:28
I don't think you can compare those two cheats.
kaspar007
28th December 2007, 18:23
can anyone tell me what is sv_pure bypass
Holz
28th December 2007, 18:30
http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Pure_Servers
A 'pure server' is a server that forces all clients on the server to use content that matches what is on the server. This way, clients who are playing on the server cannot cheat by modifying the game content.
Without pure servers, clients could modify their materials, sounds, and models to give them advantages in the game. They might allow themselves to see through walls, make enemy models larger or brighter, or make certain sounds louder, thus giving them an advantage while playing.
And this bypass basically lets you bypass those checks.
Tom189
2nd January 2008, 22:11
is this vac banned?
phahoai
3rd January 2008, 08:05
every release of gemini is so ...damn nice
I remember he released a radar hack that allow you to see enemies and teammate on radar, that was pwned
now this one helps me using color head in pure server ^^
t/y
kagebunshin01
3rd January 2008, 19:30
is this vac proof?
fusD
9th January 2008, 13:34
is this vac proof?
No cheat is 100% VAC Proof, although no-one here has mentioned being banned. It is now roughly 3 months old so it could be very well detected. If you don't want too risk getting banned... dont use it:squareeyed:
EDIT
SORRY regarding the bump I hit 2nd page :| thought it was a really recent thread..
phahoai
16th February 2008, 16:54
I up this thread again to ask, this does not pass zBlock, Im blocked model color and no sky :D (and other mat)
is there any other hax can pure bypass except this ?
Skelletor22
16th February 2008, 18:59
yes there are other sv_pure bypasses and consistency bypasses.
i recommend you to:
use a player model wallhack and and and sv_pure and consistency bypass. then you go through Zblock
sLosh
8th April 2008, 12:31
any banned for this yet? or this safe ISH?
paul02
9th April 2008, 05:26
http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Pure_Servers
And this bypass basically lets you bypass those checks.
Cool :squareeyed:!!! But if so, what are the type of scripts can we use then? cl_forwardspeed 999/interp..e.t.c ?
My anti-virus caught this. Help me understand if its supposed to be this way:
Infostealer.GampassRisk Level 1: Very LowPrinter Friendly Page
SUMMARY TECHNICAL DETAILS REMOVAL Discovered: November 12, 2006
Updated: March 16, 2007 7:51:32 AM
Also Known As: LIneage YI [Computer Associates], Bloodhound.KillAV [Symantec]
Type: Trojan
Infection Length: Varies
Systems Affected: Windows 98, Windows 95, Windows XP, Windows Me, Windows NT, Windows Server 2003, Windows 2000
Infostealer.Gampass is a generic detection for a Trojan horse that steals online game accounts, such as Lineage, Ragnarok online, Rohan, and Rexue Jianghu.
Note: Virus definitions dated November 17, 2006 or later may detect this threat as Bloodhound.KillAV.ProtectionInitial Rapid Release version November 12, 2006
Latest Rapid Release version April 8, 2008 revision 037
Initial Daily Certified version November 12, 2006
Latest Daily Certified version April 8, 2008 revision 036
Initial Weekly Certified release date November 15, 2006
Click here for a more detailed description of Rapid Release and Daily Certified virus definitions.
Threat AssessmentWildWild Level: Low
Number of Infections: 0 - 49
Number of Sites: 0 - 2
Geographical Distribution: Low
Threat Containment: Easy
Removal: Easy
DamageDamage Level: Low
DistributionDistribution Level: Low
Writeup By: Kaoru Hayashi
Holz
9th April 2008, 12:55
Cool :squareeyed:!!! But if so, what are the type of scripts can we use then? cl_forwardspeed 999/interp..e.t.c ?
Uhm, no, don't confuse sv_pure with sv_cheats. :v
My anti-virus caught this.
False detection.
Knightsofwibble
29th May 2008, 23:51
Sorry once again for the old thread bump, but I just want to verify a few things.
If I were to use this bypass in combination w/ any Mathack (Freakvision, Skell, etc.) in a sv_pure server, would it then show up with the wireframe? I'm not sure if that makes sense, but meh.
Also, any news on whether this is still VAC Proof?
I'm not sure if that makes sense, but meh.
Me neither.
If I were to use this bypass in combination w/ any Mathack (Freakvision, Skell, etc.) in a sv_pure server, would it then show up with the wireframe?
Well, depends, this bypass will simply allow you to pass the server's sv_pure checks, FreakVision as well as "Skell" will make the walls and stuff "wallhacked", other material cheats (see working hacks sticky) will make them wireframed..
Knightsofwibble
30th May 2008, 16:17
Alright, I think I understand.
BUFFBOY
14th June 2008, 09:27
wats the status of this ??
Skelletor22
14th June 2008, 17:40
this is realy old.
if it is undetected i dont know.
You can search for it in the MPC download section and look at it's status, but thats not 100 percent reliable, it is good though.
keanokev
8th July 2008, 18:13
I dont think this works anymore it worked last week but isnt working this week :(
ericsme123
10th July 2008, 10:53
i get a game crash when i start this and try and join a server..is there a way to fix it?
please help
BUFFBOY
10th July 2008, 14:02
its not working anymore
any fix ?
vashgs
10th July 2008, 19:34
This is very simple to make...
frostmourne77
10th July 2008, 23:19
Don't use this, you're going to get VAC Banned. It's detected.
vashgs
11th July 2008, 00:39
Nevermind the fact that it doesn't work since the source engine update today.
gla300
17th July 2008, 23:39
hmmm this program is completely undetected i've been using it since the release time or so now and i never got banned, i use it to force the use of color models and weapon skins.
and btw the program is a Trojan but its harmless, my Avast anti virus didn't catch it until it was updated last month.
anyway i deleted it....i'm clean now :P
so all i want to say is that it is safe to use....because i guess that the program processes just disappear after you enter a server which mean its completely undetected.
i hope i helped you.
thx for the Program make :D
Fracture36
18th July 2008, 10:46
Noooo! my favorite cheat doesnt work!!! >_<.. someone please fix it! crashes css since update..
also does any one know where to find a crosshair overlay? so i can no-scope with sniper. mukkanhair doesnt work anymore, and i hate reddot.
vashgs
18th July 2008, 18:42
Ummm...my multihack has a sniper crosshair and this sv_pure bypass. I think that answers your question?
cjii
18th July 2008, 19:21
This was my favourite hack too. In fact, it was the only hack i used. The models are friggin' undetectable with low resolutions, so i used colored ones. Not anymore :(
This totally sucks! I loved this hack more than i love my girlfriend and now im depressed. This truely was a great hack. Completely undetected for a long time and served it's purpose 100%.
I just hope someone will do a new one. Those multihacks around these days sucks ass. Completely useless features, not working properly and gets detected after a week.
WE WANT SV_PURE_BYPASS V2.0! :love1:
*thanks Gemini, suxx and everybody else involved with this hack*
Fracture36
18th August 2008, 14:29
This was my favourite hack too. In fact, it was the only hack i used. The models are friggin' undetectable with low resolutions, so i used colored ones. Not anymore :(
I just hope someone will do a new one. Those multihacks around these days sucks ass. Completely useless features, not working properly and gets detected after a week.
WE WANT SV_PURE_BYPASS V2.0! :love1:
I agree with everything you said here, and this hack is the only hack i use as well, just because i <3 colored skins, real hacks suck ass. altho i do use a noscope overlay xD.
ANYWAYZZ SOMEONE PLEASE UPDATE THIS HACKZORZ!!!!! WILL REWARD WITH BJ'S!!!!
|Never Miss|
18th August 2008, 15:12
I am pretty sure you can just use colored models...also why would you say real hacks suck ass? these people at least show their cheating not hide it because they suck at playing without them.
nexus1993
28th August 2008, 14:33
What exatly is this ?
Liek what does it do ?
stickybun
28th August 2008, 17:29
What exatly is this ?
Liek what does it do ?
try reading the thread m8 its pretty self explanatory:\
badguy20
4th October 2008, 01:15
so this cheat doesnt work anymore?
kifos
4th October 2008, 10:01
maybe... work
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.