PDA

View Full Version : Daz hack v1.6.4 detected


STEVE666
20th February 2004, 20:31
Hats off to you Daz and all those who do these hacks they are superb, I was useing your latest version today and was kicked as PB detected it, I got back on the server asked why they kicked me and they said PB said i was cheating, turned the hack off and carried on playing, good luck with your new version m8:classic:

Simple
20th February 2004, 21:03
Sorry I don't believe what they had told you. I run a server (Pure and PB enabled) and this hack is not seen.

EDIT... By the way you were let back in the server, if PB said you were cheating that sure wouldn't had happn.

Now what I think happen is that you were banned for "0" min. because for some reason PB couldn't send your computer the info it wanted to. so that is why you could have got the 0 min ban and was let back on the server. Then after that PB file were loaded on your computer and then everything was fine.

If you don't mind, it would be nice for you to make sure you are right about something before coming here and making your 1st post saying something stopped working.

Mazta
20th February 2004, 21:35
Yeah. I can't concur with what you claim. I've been playing the last 3 hours with it enabled, and not a single kick.

xollox
20th February 2004, 21:37
He did it in a very respectful way, though, which, IMO, is fine to do. Steve, in the future it would be nice if you included the exact kick message, including whatever number it gave you.

darkraver
20th February 2004, 21:48
1: as i mentioned before in an other thread i dont like cheating. in fact never tried any from the hacks here. i am just here to see whats going on in the cheater scene.

... so ... now 1.6 is released and a few weeks we played with it. nice time! 95% of the cheater kidz are gone (imho!). the mysterious hits where you wonder from where they came from are gone (sry for my bad english..its not my native language). now the fog is back for all. enemy soldiers cant see anymore thru walls, and this happend to often right befor patch1.6 release. at all i have a better feeling in the game ... i know my skill (and i am good ;] ~#100 in bftracks/assault...sometimes tank) and i know whats possible and whats not.

some pll with amazing skill disapeard ... oh wonder! *ironic* (also one of my clanmates ... he was an amazing good tanker (~#50 bftracks) -before 1.6 *hrhr*)

i know my -public-server-game-mates ... all the ppl i thought they where really "skilled" are still there (i saw them playing when i was in their team... they are THAT good!)sometimes ... very rarely i think "oh ... man ... this must be a cheater" in 50% of all they situations i think also "ok..with VERY much luck & skill it could be possible).

now its very entertaining for me to read all the ..."it works" ... "it works NOT!" ...... "HELP! dunno what to do now.. now i am LAME" threads :] as i said in the other thread (did ya read it? ;] ) ... i dont care about a few cheaters ... (i am sure pretty much of them are frightend to use hacks because of the cdkey-hash ban system they heard from *hrhr*)

had to say this ... maybe wrong place ... i dont know/found better place then here :]

Mazta
21st February 2004, 00:47
Right.. well. You have here a public hack that punkbuster hasn't managed to stop going on 2 weeks now. (just for 1.6.4) Give that another 2 weeks, and I can promise ya - the numbers will grow.

CharlesBronson
21st February 2004, 01:16
I honestly don't think PB hasn't stopped this hack for lack of effort. They either have overextended themselves and can't contribute time to it, are spending resources finding out why honest players are getting kicked (of course, they may be cheating LOL), or decided to take it to the next level and rework their strategy.

I favor the last option, but what is still a mystery is why not release a stopgap in the meantime to keep the 133t gamerz happy. Of course, you could believe the rumor that they DELIBERATELY sit back and accumulated GUIDs of cheaters to globally ban them all (not entirely consistent with their policy, but anyway).