Accuracy

[test0r]

Have a short question and want to have a short answer from you ;)

I tried to make accuracy in BFV and got a few DMAs. After BP them (read and write), I got the hack working with nopping out two instructions - one influences the inner-cursor and one the outer-cursor drawing (with cursor I mean the target, you know ... I am still german :D).

Anyone here, that has the same results? In my eyes this is the only way to "lock" the cursor.... is my first accuracy, maybe someone who did it in BF42 can confirm this too?

THX, for feedback ;)

[Spontaneous]

This is on my list of things to do this weekend. I want to work on a fog right now.

[Lasix]

I want to hit the fog as well...since there is not a slider can you give me some insight on what to serach for

[NOPing for Food]

I can't seem to narrow down the addies...I start running and check for a decreased value, stop and check for increased value (I pause the game so they don't change while scanning). I either end up getting around 400 (doesn't get smaller) addies or 0 after some time. Am I scanning in the wrong direction (I did standing=increase, moving=decrease like was posted in the normal BF section) What range should the values be in?

[test0r]

OK LOL, I did it the wrong way...

when the crosshair was "big" I made a increasing search, when it was small I made a decreasing search. Have to do the other way around :D

THX to this great forum, and for the great "Adv. Search" function. That ownz!


==================================

Can someone plz help me with the accuracy, I tried it in BFV about 3 times now but I dont get it...
Someone knows what the accuracy in BF42 was like??

[DrKenneth]

Originally posted by test0r on 19th March 2004 at 19:38
Have a short question and want to have a short answer from you ;)

I tried to make accuracy in BFV and got a few DMAs. After BP them (read and write), I got the hack working with nopping out two instructions - one influences the inner-cursor and one the outer-cursor drawing (with cursor I mean the target, you know ... I am still german :D).

Anyone here, that has the same results? In my eyes this is the only way to "lock" the cursor.... is my first accuracy, maybe someone who did it in BF42 can confirm this too?

THX, for feedback ;)

Are you sure you're not just nopping the code that changes the crosshair graphic position? There is 1 float for the start of the crosshair line, and one for the end. If you nopped the code that changes those, then you're making the crosshair graphic not move, not the actual value that controls accuracy. Also, you should be able to do 1 NOP that will give perfect accuracy, which is even better than the sniper. (Even though the crosshairs will still expand; it is ignoring that value.)

[test0r]

yeah dr kenneth you are right, I already got that . It is correct, the thing with the crosshair. I notice that the accuracy is though still the same...

Give me hints how to find the real accuracy DMA.
(I already know: standing = increasing; running = decreasing) - but I didnt find the right DMAs...

And how are you then doing the accuracy hack? Nopping/changing asm code, or do you have to "lock" the DMA value?


Thx for answer ;)

[woodyno1]

i guess an accuracy hackwould be undetectable to catch by PB, because a screen shot couldnt really catch that correct? also as long as you dont mess with any values that might upset PB

[test0r]

lol, PB checks memory addresses of BF. Any hack is detectable, screenshot is only one feature of PB...

[test0r]

hey can someone help me with the accuracy again?