[C++] ArmyOps 2.7 Incomplete Headers

[tamimego]

The exports are completely ****ed, besides that, the uscript side of things is complete.

This will not compile, this is for people who know they would have use for them.

Good luck.

Edit: UPDATED, Read post on second page.

3 things before complete SDK:
Export Ordering
Class Ordering
Virtual Ordering ( Not too fussed about it really ).

[S@t@nic@]

nice tami

[Trundle]

great job

[temp2]

The exports are completely ****ed, besides that, the uscript side of things is complete.

Don't be so hard on yourself, that's excellent work Tamimego. Pulling the order directly from the .u files probably removes the problem entirely.

It's seems a little hardship i.e. the lack of my SDK's creates a lot of good work from some people.

[HUMM3R]

The exports are completely ****ed, besides that, the uscript side of things is complete.

Its pretty good, doesn't need much time to invest in the generator to make it 100% usable, even by beginners.

[PalaceOnTheSand]

The exports are completely ****ed, besides that, the uscript side of things is complete.

I don't care for native functions but do you think that native class structure (i.e. fields and inheritance tree) is properly decompiled?

Cheers

[tamimego]

It's seems a little hardship i.e. the lack of my SDK's creates a lot of good work round here.

Its nothing new, I wrote the gen in 2.5.0, I rewrote it in early 2.6.0 and it generates in under 3 seconds with the push of a button, now I dont use any Core files and to get it to work with 2.7.0 it was only a matter of adding one line, LastLabelName

Did you know that there are functions within the engine itself for ordering and collecting objects?

ExportCPPItem or something? nForce used this method to save time and hassle, he explained it to me, but i prefered manual filtering.

EDIT: Just re-read what you said, you were referring to the order of classes im guessing? Also sorry about my crazy bitch again you the other day, I was in a really ****ed mood, women gettin to me m8. You think you could email me some info bout those functions ?

[temp2]

ExportCPPItem or something? nForce used this method to save time and hassle, he explained it to me, but i prefered manual filtering.

Me too but primarily because ExportCPPItem is a virtual. nForce does some good work.

[HUMM3R]

EDIT: Just re-read what you said, you were referring to the order of classes im guessing?

With a little modification, I used the linker's order, plus ordering based on super and dependencies. And no base class undefined at all.

Also, a good strategy is to make wrappers around all structures you want to export, and use the wrapper's functions. That way you can rewrite in your game dependant wrapper all generator sensitive functions, and its easy to adapt to different UE's, even with static linking. (f.e. PropertiesSize, you can rewrite in your wrapper to use a custom address inside the class, without the need of core files, or an exported function)

I don't care for native functions but do you think that native class structure (i.e. fields and inheritance tree) is properly decompiled?

Cheers

Fields, yes, all engine exposed fields can be decompiled; with inheritance you have to work a little more, because of multiple inheritance. Check my site from my link in my sig for 2.6 headers, to see what I'm talking about. I still have problems with functionality for the correct inheritance.

Its nothing new, I wrote the gen in 2.5.0, I rewrote it in early 2.6.0 and it generates in under 3 seconds with the push of a button, now I dont use any Core files and to get it to work with 2.7.0 it was only a matter of adding one line, LastLabelName

3 seconds is utopic , mine is done in more than 2 minutes, but most of that time is loading of packages. And the point again, using core files is just more pain in the ass.

[KizZamP-]

very nice job tami,could come in use .

[tamimego]

I'm really bad at the std shit,

so umm this might be newb but could someone write me a function that takes a string, finds a sub string and replaces only that substring with another string.

I would use string.replace but that doesnt "ONLY" replace that one thing im looking for, say I have "THIS IS A TEST"

I want it to look for "THIS" and replace with "LOLOLOL"

string.replace would do "LOLOLOL A TEST" I want "LOLOLOL IS A TEST"

[Trundle]

I'm really bad at the std shit

O_o. You are joking?! Without std c++ would not be c++. Too bad so many people coding C here...

Anyway, this should work:

string s="THIS IS A TEST";
s.replace(s.find("THIS"), 4, "LOLOLOL");

[HUMM3R]

I'm really bad at the std shit,

so umm this might be newb but could someone write me a function that takes a string, finds a sub string and replaces only that substring with another string.

I would use string.replace but that doesnt "ONLY" replace that one thing im looking for, say I have "THIS IS A TEST"

I want it to look for "THIS" and replace with "LOLOLOL"

string.replace would do "LOLOLOL A TEST" I want "LOLOLOL IS A TEST"

Doing it the chopper way:

            index = current.find(TEXT("__cdecl "));
            if (index != string::npos) {
              left = current.substr(0, index);
              right = current.substr(index + 8,current.size() -index-8);
              current = left.append(TEXT("CDECL ")).append(right);
            }

where 8 is the length of TEXT("__cdecl ")

O_o. You are joking?! Without std c++ would not be c++. Too bad so many people coding C here...

Anyway, this should work:

string s="THIS IS A TEST";
s.replace(s.find("THIS"), s.find("THIS")+4, "LOLOLOL");

This will replace only 4 characters, with "LOLO", he wants some kind of concatenation.

[Trundle]

This will replace only 4 characters, with "LOLO".

Of course it must be s.replace(s.find("THIS"), 4, "LOLOLOL"); find returns a string::size_t and not an interator. My mistake!

[EDIT]A proof O_o: http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/8...benanntaz2.png[/EDIT]

[tamimego]

thnx for that